Knowledge
Latent Space Limitations and Problem Space Mapping
Foundation models reason by remixing patterns that already exist in their latent space. When we ask them to operate on concepts they have never embedded, they tend to guess: the surface phrasing may look right, but the internal representation remains fuzzy. Three practical observations follow:
Supplying reference text for ideas the model already grasps rarely improves behavior-at best it repeats the phrasing, at worst it adds noise.
Introducing entirely novel concepts during inference typically produces brittle results unless those concepts can be reframed using latent structures the model already knows.
"Teaching" new material through prompt stuffing works only when the model can anchor the material to familiar measurements, causal relationships, or procedures.
We therefore treat latent coverage as a constraint. Rather than expecting the LLM to absorb arbitrary primers, we invest in reliable priming: activating and structuring regions of latent space that we know map cleanly onto the problem at hand. When the latent geometry is missing altogether, we collect the measurements needed to build a new abstraction instead of pretending the model already has one.
Amigo's knowledge system uses a unified framework that primes the agent's latent space through dynamic behaviors. This approach differs from conventional knowledge systems by focusing on contextual activation and problem space shaping rather than simply adding information. It recognizes that knowledge is not an isolated component but a crucial part of the larger, interconnected system of memory, knowledge, and reasoning, where high-bandwidth integration and cyclical optimization are key to overall agent intelligence.
Reframing vs. Adding Knowledge
When faced with concepts outside an LLM's training:
Traditional Approach (Ineffective):
"Metachronous oligometastases is a condition where..."
[LLM attempts to use definition but lacks foundational understanding]Amigo's Reframing Approach (Effective):
"Think of this as a situation where cancer has spread to a few locations, but these new tumors appeared after the initial diagnosis rather than being discovered simultaneously..."
[LLM activates existing understanding of cancer progression, temporal relationships, and limited metastasis]This reframing activates regions of the LLM's latent space that can approximate the novel concept through recombination of known concepts, enabling effective reasoning despite the knowledge boundary.
The same principle applies powerfully to proprietary and opinionated knowledge. Rather than attempting to "teach" the model entirely new concepts, Amigo recomposes existing conceptual frameworks into proprietary methodologies that create unique problem formulations:
Proprietary Knowledge Integration:
The resulting agent doesn't just reference frameworks; it fundamentally thinks through them, creating an experience that authentically embodies the expert's unique intellectual property and approach.
Impact of Latent Space Activation
Example Without Latent Space Activation:
Example With Latent Space Activation:
The dynamic behavior has transformed the response by:
Optimal Latent Space Activation: Priming the exercise physiology region of the model's latent space
Problem Topology Reshaping: Creating a solvable problem through data integration
Frame Shifting: Moving from generic rest advice to systematic fatigue assessment
Context-Aware Compression/Decompression: Unpacking relevant exercise science concepts in the right context
Personalized Problem Representation: Tailoring the cognitive frame to the user's specific situation
Latent Space Activation Patterns
High-Stakes Protocol Framing
High-Stakes Protocol Framing applies industry-standard protocols to guide the agent's thinking in critical situations. This approach activates specific mental frameworks that ensure the agent consistently follows best practices during high-risk scenarios. It's especially useful in regulated industries like healthcare or finance, where compliance is essential. The system proactively recognizes when these protocols should apply, automatically shifting the agent's approach without needing explicit instructions to do so.
For example:
Research Frame Integration
Research Frame Integration helps the agent discuss complex scientific topics in an accessible way. While the agent already knows about many research domains, this approach activates the right scientific concepts at the right moment in a conversation. It reformulates questions to match current scientific understanding, unpacks complex research ideas in understandable terms, and presents information from an evidence-based perspective. This allows users to discuss specialized scientific topics naturally, without requiring the agent to learn new information during the conversation.
For example:
Enterprise Frame Customization
Enterprise Frame Customization adapts the agent to embody an organization's unique approach and expertise. It builds company-specific ways of thinking directly into the agent, allowing it to naturally apply proprietary methodologies when addressing problems. The agent adopts the organization's specific language patterns and brand voice, while also respecting any regulatory requirements. This creates a consistent experience that authentically represents the company's distinct intellectual approach. Rather than simply retrieving company information when needed, the agent genuinely thinks through problems using the company's proprietary frameworks.
For example:
This integration fundamentally reframes the problem space by:
Conceptual Recomposition: Recombining existing concepts (departments, priorities, alignment) into a proprietary framework that reshapes how the problem is perceived
Experience Control: Using the proprietary methodology to dictate the structure of the entire interaction
Value Embedding: Encoding organizational values and approaches directly into the agent's reasoning process
The result isn't simply an agent that references proprietary methodologies, but one that actively thinks through them-creating an experience that authentically represents the organization's unique intellectual approach and expertise.
Bridging Knowledge and Data
Dynamic behaviors seamlessly incorporate foundational knowledge.
Contextual Protocol Activation: Behaviors can inject domain protocols exactly when needed
Example: When a user mentions side effects from medication, the "Medication Guidance" behavior activates, bringing in precise medical guidelines
Regulatory Compliance: Behaviors enforce compliant information delivery
Example: Financial advice behavior automatically incorporates required disclaimers
Regionalized Expertise: Behaviors adapt knowledge to geographic context
Example: Fitness behavior provides regionally appropriate recommendations based on seasonal climate and available facilities
Example: Knowledge Integration
Data Integration
Simultaneously, behaviors manage real-time data flow:
Biometric Integration: Connected device data incorporated into response context
Example: Exercise recommendation behavior incorporates recent activity levels from wearable device
External Research: Behaviors trigger targeted external research
Example: When a user shares a training question, behavior initiates exercise science research and seamlessly integrates findings
Dynamic Assessment: Behaviors generate real-time assessments based on current context
Example: Stress management behavior analyzes tone and content to assess current emotional state
Example: Data Integration
In summary:
Attempt to add information without considering dimensions
Optimizes dimensional selection to activate relevant sufficient statistics
Knowledge as static content
Knowledge as interpretive lens that shapes how measurements are understood
Uniform knowledge activation regardless of domain
Domain-specialized arc selection based on cohort membership and contracts
Static knowledge retrieval
Dynamic arc activation that respects entry predicates and exit guarantees
Treat knowledge as content to be retrieved
Treat knowledge as dimensional framework that determines which statistics matter
Static repositories disconnected from operational context
Dynamic blueprint evolution based on measurement-driven discovery
Rigid retrieval based on explicit queries or keywords
Arc selection based on sufficient statistics and cohort validation
Knowledge and tool usage as separate mechanisms
Unified framework where arc execution includes both reasoning and action
One-size-fits-all knowledge application
Cohort-specific arc variants based on measured effectiveness
Limited to retrieving information
Reshapes dimensional blueprint to capture causal structure
Measurement-Led Capability Enhancement
When problem space mapping and metrics reveal genuine capability gaps, Amigo applies the same measurement-first discipline used elsewhere in the platform:
From Identified Gaps to Targeted Improvement
Gap Characterization: Metrics and simulations isolate the sub-problems where performance lags.
Measurement Contract: We define the quantized arcs, success criteria, and boundary checks that will signal improvement.
Scenario Exploration: The verification evolutionary chamber generates variations that focus on the missing capability while keeping other behaviors constant.
Objective Validation: Improvements must raise admissibility margins for the targeted gap without eroding neighbouring metrics.
This keeps optimization surgical rather than indiscriminate:
Enhances Model Capabilities by introducing new, well-measured primitives.
Preserves Existing Strengths because unchanged arcs retain their proven measurements.
Maintains a Continuous Improvement Loop driven by the same telemetry that spotted the gap.
Strategic Value of Measurement-Led Enhancement
Maximizes Return on Investment: Resources flow only toward gaps with clear measurement contracts.
Accelerates Improvement Cycles: Focused measurements let the chamber converge on fixes quickly.
Creates Measurable Outcomes: Before/after reuse statistics show whether the new primitive actually delivers value.
Builds on Existing Capabilities: We exhaust the latent space reachable through better activation before adding new primitives.
Core Mechanisms
Contextual Measurements keep the search aligned with real-world criteria.
Disciplined Exploration widens search where measurements show headroom and prunes branches that fail safety or quality gates.
Memory-Integrated Feedback lets the system compare candidate arcs against historical performance.
User Model Conditioning ensures improvements respect the dimensional differences across cohorts.
The result is a pattern-discovery loop that extends knowledge capabilities with the same rigor used elsewhere in the architecture-no reward propagation required.
From Knowledge to Complete Agent Intelligence
Amigo's knowledge system represents the critical link between the raw capabilities of foundation models and measurable enterprise-grade performance. However, true agent intelligence arises not from knowledge alone, but from its deep, cyclical integration with memory and reasoning. These three are not separate pillars but facets of a single cognitive challenge, where the bandwidth of their interconnections is paramount.
The Intelligence Triad
Complete agent effectiveness emerges from the synergistic integration of three core components, viewed as a unified system:
Optimal Latent Space Activation (Knowledge & Reasoning Focus): Perfect priming of the model's existing capabilities through dynamic behaviors. This ensures that the right knowledge is available and influences the reasoning framework.
Complete Problem Space Topology & Rich Memory Context (Memory & Context Focus): Structural understanding of the entire problem domain combined with necessary data integration and a rich, accessible memory. Memory deeply influences how knowledge is applied and how reasoning is framed, while new knowledge and reasoning, in turn, drive the recontextualization of memory.
Targeted Capability Enhancement (Cyclical Optimization): Precise improvement of identified gaps through metrics-driven pattern discovery, which refines the interplay across memory, knowledge, and reasoning.
This triad ensures that enterprises can:
Rapidly Achieve Baseline: Quickly establish near-human performance levels through effective latent space activation
Systematically Optimize: Methodically improve performance across the entire problem space through metrics and simulations
Strategically Enhance: Selectively apply measurement-led pattern discovery only where it delivers meaningful performance gains
Last updated
Was this helpful?